Compare Tine and retroly on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Collaboration tools, open-source vs Retroly offers a free tier to get started…
At a Glance
Tine
retroly
Primary category
Collaboration
Collaboration
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
open-source
Retroly offers a free tier to get started plus a paid subscription tier for expanded usage, billed via Stripe; exact current pricing and plan limits are not published on the site and should be confirmed directly with the vendor.
Starting price
Free (self-hosted); hosted plans from EUR 12.90/month
Not documented
Free plan
Yes
Yes
Free trial
Not documented
Not documented
Platforms
Web
Not documented
Team collaboration
Not documented
Yes
AI features
Not documented
Not documented
Public API
Yes
Not documented
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
Tine
Self-Hosted Business Edition — Free N/A (self-hosted, optional paid support)
Hosted Groupware — EUR 12.90/month monthly
Hosted Pro — EUR 24.90/month monthly
retroly
No individual plan breakdown documented yet.
Pros & Cons
Tine
Pros
Fully open-source under AGPLv3, including features normally reserved for paid enterprise tiers elsewhere
Combines groupware and CRM in one suite, reducing the need for separate tools
Free to self-host with no per-user licensing cost
Long track record, with continuous development since 2008
Managed hosting option available for teams that do not want to self-administer a server
Cons
Smaller community and ecosystem compared to mainstream groupware platforms like Zimbra or Nextcloud
Interface and documentation are less polished than large commercial competitors
Self-hosting requires PHP and SQL server administration skills
Primarily documented and supported in German and English, which may limit reach in other markets
Hosted SaaS pricing scales per user and per gigabyte, which can add up for larger teams
retroly
Pros
Focused, single-purpose interface built specifically for retrospective meetings rather than a bolted-on feature of a larger suite
Suitable for both remote and co-located teams
Offers a free tier so teams can try it before paying
Cons
Retroly does not publish a public pricing or feature page, making it hard to evaluate plan limits before signing up
Little visible product activity or marketing since its 2019 Product Hunt launch
No documented integrations with common team tools like Slack or Jira
Use Cases
Tine
Self-hosted email and calendar collaboration — Organizations that want full control over their email and calendar data self-host Tine on their own servers instead of relying on a third-party SaaS provider.
Combined groupware and CRM for small businesses — Small and mid-sized businesses use Tine's built-in CRM alongside its groupware modules to manage both internal collaboration and customer relationships in one system.
Open-source alternative to proprietary groupware — Organizations that require fully auditable, open-source software for compliance or budget reasons choose Tine over closed-source suites like Microsoft Exchange or Zimbra's proprietary tiers.