Harvest and Toggl Track both start free and both track time, but they are built for different jobs. Harvest is a time tracking platform with real invoicing…
| Harvest | Toggl Track | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary category | Productivity | Productivity |
| Rating | Not documented | Not documented |
| Pricing model | Freemium, per-seat subscription with usage-based fees | freemium |
| Starting price | Free | Free; paid plans from $9/user/month |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Not documented |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android, Mac, Windows | Not documented |
| Team collaboration | Not documented | Not documented |
| AI features | Not documented | Not documented |
| Public API | Yes | Not documented |
Invoicing and expense tracking
Harvest: Harvest includes real invoicing and expense tracking starting on its free plan
Toggl Track: Toggl Track's provided facts do not document built-in invoicing or expense tracking
For freelancers and small businesses that bill clients directly, having invoicing built into the time tracker removes the need for a separate billing tool
Integration breadth
Harvest: Harvest documents integrations with Asana and Slack
Toggl Track: Toggl Track documents 100 plus integrations across productivity and project tools
Teams with a large or varied software stack need a time tracker that connects to whatever they already use, not just a couple of named apps
Free plan structure
Harvest: Harvest's free plan is capped at 1 seat and 2 projects but includes full invoicing and expense tracking
Toggl Track: Toggl Track's free plan is capped by a limited number of users
The shape of a free tier cap determines whether a solo user or a small team can realistically run their whole workflow on it for free
Cross-platform automated tracking
Harvest: Harvest's provided facts do not document automated tracking across web, mobile, and desktop apps
Toggl Track: Toggl Track explicitly offers time tracking across web, mobile, and desktop apps
Field teams and people switching devices throughout the day need tracking that follows them without manual re-entry
Profitability analysis
Harvest: Harvest's provided facts do not document a dedicated profitability analysis feature
Toggl Track: Toggl Track offers profitability analysis on its Premium tier
Agencies pricing projects need visibility into whether billed hours are actually profitable against cost
SSO tier and price
Harvest: Harvest offers SAML-based SSO on its Enterprise tier at 14 dollars per seat per month
Toggl Track: Toggl Track offers SSO on its Premium tier at 18 dollars per user per month
Organizations with identity provider requirements need to know which tier and price unlocks SSO before rolling the tool out company-wide
Entry-level paid plan pricing
Harvest: Harvest's Teams plan is 9 dollars per seat per month
Toggl Track: Toggl Track's Starter plan is 9 dollars per user per month
The two tools price their first paid tier identically, so the deciding factor becomes which set of Starter or Teams features matters more, not raw cost
Top-tier plan pricing model
Harvest: Harvest's Enterprise tier is a fixed 14 dollars per seat per month
Toggl Track: Toggl Track's Enterprise tier is custom pricing
Fixed enterprise pricing is easier to budget for upfront, while custom pricing usually means negotiation and added capabilities beyond the standard tiers
Core product focus
Harvest: Harvest centers on time tracking paired with invoicing and expense tracking
Toggl Track: Toggl Track centers on time tracking paired with broad integrations and profitability reporting
The core focus signals which adjacent workflow, billing versus tool ecosystem connectivity, each product is optimized to support
| Feature | Harvest | Toggl Track |
|---|---|---|
| Time tracking | Available | Available |
| Automated tracking across web, mobile, and desktop | Not documented | Available |
| Billable rates | Not documented | Available |
| Feature | Harvest | Toggl Track |
|---|---|---|
| Invoicing | Available | Not documented |
| Expense tracking | Available | Not documented |
| Feature | Harvest | Toggl Track |
|---|---|---|
| Asana integration | Available | Not documented |
| Slack integration | Available | Not documented |
| Overall integration breadth | Limited | Available |
| Feature | Harvest | Toggl Track |
|---|---|---|
| Project profitability analysis | Not documented | Available |
| Feature | Harvest | Toggl Track |
|---|---|---|
| SAML-based SSO | Available | Available |
| Feature | Harvest | Toggl Track |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Available | Available |
| Entry paid tier | Available | Available |
| Enterprise tier | Available | Available |
| Feature | Harvest | Toggl Track |
|---|---|---|
| Web app | Not documented | Available |
| Mobile app | Not documented | Available |
| Desktop app | Not documented | Available |
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
Pros
Cons
Pros
Cons
Their entry paid tiers are priced the same at 9 dollars per seat or user per month, Harvest Teams versus Toggl Track Starter, but Harvest's free plan includes invoicing and expense tracking while Toggl Track's free plan is capped by number of users, and Harvest's Enterprise tier is a fixed 14 dollars per seat per month versus Toggl Track's custom-priced Enterprise tier.
Harvest includes real invoicing and expense tracking starting on its free plan, while Toggl Track's documented facts do not confirm built-in invoicing, so teams needing invoicing directly from the time tracker are better served by Harvest.
Toggl Track documents 100 plus integrations, while Harvest documents specific integrations with Asana and Slack, making Toggl Track the broader choice for teams with a varied software stack.
Toggl Track explicitly supports automated time tracking across web, mobile, and desktop apps, while Harvest's provided facts do not document cross-platform automated tracking specifically.
Yes, both offer SAML-based single sign-on, Harvest on its Enterprise tier at 14 dollars per seat per month and Toggl Track on its Premium tier at 18 dollars per user per month.
Toggl Track documents a dedicated profitability analysis feature on its Premium tier, while Harvest's provided facts do not document an equivalent profitability analysis feature.
Read the full Harvest review · Read the full Toggl Track review