solvian vs Propertybase

Compare solvian and Propertybase on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — Pricing is not publicly disclosed; prospective customers must request a demo.…

At a Glance

 solvianPropertybase
Primary categoryCRMReal Estate, Construction & Field Service
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelPricing is not publicly disclosed; prospective customers must request a demo. Visit solvian.nl for current terms.Per-user monthly subscription with a minimum seat commitment for the Salesforce Edition; the separate Propertybase GO product uses custom, quote-based pricing.
Starting priceNot documentedFrom $79 per user per month (Salesforce Edition, 10-user minimum, roughly $790/month minimum)
Free planNot documentedNot documented
Free trialNot documentedNot documented
PlatformsNot documentedWeb, iOS, Android, Mobile App
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresNot documentedNot documented
Public APINot documentedYes

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

solvian

No individual plan breakdown documented yet.

Propertybase

Propertybase GO — Custom quote Annual or monthly (quote-based)
Propertybase Salesforce Edition — From $79/user/month (10-user minimum) Monthly, quarterly, or annual

Pros & Cons

solvian

Pros

  • Combines four typically separate back-office functions — planning, bookings, invoicing, and CRM — into one system for training providers, per Solvian's own product description.
  • Markets tailored messaging by training-provider industry/branch, suggesting the product is positioned to fit different types of course businesses.

Cons

  • The marketing site and all available evidence are Dutch-only, with no sign of an English-language version for non-Dutch-speaking teams.
  • No public pricing is available in the crawled evidence — prospective customers must request a demo to learn cost and plan details, rather than self-serve signup.

Propertybase

Pros

  • Deep native Salesforce integration on the Salesforce Edition appeals to brokerages already invested in the Salesforce ecosystem
  • Backed by Lone Wolf Technologies' broader real estate software suite, including transaction management and back-office tools
  • Strong IDX and MLS integration with real-time listing synchronization for lead generation
  • Established product with roots going back to 2010 and continued investment under Lone Wolf and Vista Equity Partners ownership

Cons

  • Salesforce Edition requires a 10-user minimum at 79 dollars per user per month, which can be a significant upfront cost for small teams
  • Complexity and Salesforce dependency mean a steeper learning curve and potentially higher implementation and administration costs
  • Two distinct product lines (GO and Salesforce Edition) can create confusion about which version fits a given brokerage's size and needs
  • Ownership changes across three companies since 2010 (original Propertybase, Boston Logic, and Lone Wolf) mean product direction has shifted more than once

Use Cases

solvian

Propertybase

  • Enterprise brokerage CRM on Salesforce — Larger brokerages already invested in the Salesforce ecosystem use Propertybase Salesforce Edition for deep CRM customization, reporting, and workflow automation.
  • Lead generation and routing at scale — Brokerages use Propertybase's IDX-integrated websites and automated lead routing to capture and distribute leads to agents efficiently.
  • End-to-end transaction workflow — Organizations already using Lone Wolf's transaction management and back-office tools extend that workflow into CRM and marketing with Propertybase.

Read the full solvian review · Read the full Propertybase review