Tallyfy vs Stacker

Compare Tallyfy and Stacker on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both No-Code tools, subscription pricing to decide which fits your team.

At a Glance

 TallyfyStacker
Primary categoryNo-CodeNo-Code
RatingNot documentedNot documented
Pricing modelsubscriptionsubscription
Starting price$10/month per Light seat$50/month (Standard plan, 250 credits)
Free planNot documentedNot documented
Free trialYesYes
PlatformsWeb, iOS, AndroidNot documented
Team collaborationNot documentedNot documented
AI featuresYesYes
Public APIYesNot documented

Pricing Compared

Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.

Tallyfy

Full Seat — $25/month billed annually ($30/month billed monthly) monthly or annual
Light Seat — $8.33/month billed annually ($10/month billed monthly) monthly or annual
Data Feed add-on — $20 per seat per year annual only

Stacker

Standard (250 credits) — $50/month monthly
Standard (500 credits) — $100/month monthly
Standard (1,000 credits) — $200/month monthly
Standard (2,500 credits) — $500/month monthly
Standard (5,000 credits) — $1,000/month monthly
Standard (10,000 credits) — $2,000/month monthly
Enterprise — Custom pricing contact sales

Pros & Cons

Tallyfy

Pros

  • Seat-based pricing with a cheaper Light Seat option keeps costs down for task-only participants
  • Guest access lets external parties participate without needing paid accounts
  • Free SSO is included on all plans rather than gated to enterprise tiers
  • No-code template builder is approachable for non-technical process owners
  • Company emphasizes long-term stability and profitability over rapid, VC-driven growth

Cons

  • Annual plans require a non-cancellable 12-month commitment
  • Data Feed analytics is a paid add-on rather than included by default
  • Less name recognition than larger workflow platforms like Monday.com or Process Street
  • Seat-based pricing can add up for organizations with many occasional participants
  • Deeper enterprise integrations may require higher-tier discussion with sales

Stacker

Pros

  • No-code approach lets non-developers build functional internal tools and client portals quickly
  • Credit-based pricing avoids per-seat costs, which suits apps with many external client users
  • Strong fit for teams already using Airtable or Google Sheets as their data layer
  • AI prompt-to-app builder speeds up initial app creation
  • Backed by significant venture funding, including a $20 million Series A from Andreessen Horowitz

Cons

  • Credit-based pricing can become expensive as usage scales beyond the base tiers
  • Dependent on underlying data sources like Airtable, which have their own cost and scaling limits
  • Less suited to highly custom or complex application logic than full-code development
  • Enterprise pricing is not publicly disclosed and requires contacting sales
  • Recent rebrand from stackerhq.com to stacker.ai may cause some confusion for existing users

Use Cases

Tallyfy

  • Employee onboarding — HR teams standardize new hire onboarding steps across paperwork, training, and equipment setup.
  • Client and vendor intake — Operations teams run consistent intake and approval processes for new clients or vendors.
  • Compliance and SOP tracking — Organizations document and enforce standard operating procedures with an auditable trail.

Stacker

  • Internal Operations Tools — Operations teams replace manual spreadsheet workflows with structured internal apps for tracking projects, inventory, or customer records.
  • Client and Partner Portals — Businesses build secure, branded portals that give external clients or partners controlled access to relevant data.
  • Custom CRM Replacement — Small businesses use Stacker to build a lightweight custom CRM on top of existing Airtable or Google Sheets data rather than adopting a heavier, generic CRM platform.

Read the full Tallyfy review · Read the full Stacker review