Compare actitime and Kimai on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Time Tracking tools, Freemium vs Freemium / Open Source pricing to decide which…
At a Glance
actitime
Kimai
Primary category
Time Tracking
Time Tracking
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Freemium
Freemium / Open Source
Starting price
Not documented
Free (self-hosted); Kimai Cloud from EUR 2.99/user/month
Free plan
Yes
Yes
Free trial
Yes
Yes
Platforms
Not documented
Web
Team collaboration
Yes
Not documented
AI features
Not documented
Not documented
Public API
Not documented
Yes
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
actitime
No individual plan breakdown documented yet.
Kimai
Self-Hosted — Free N/A
Kimai Cloud Standard — EUR 2.99/user/month (annual), EUR 3.99 monthly Monthly or annual
Kimai Cloud Professional — EUR 3.99/user/month (annual), EUR 4.99 monthly Monthly or annual
Pros & Cons
actitime
Pros
Combines time tracking with project budgeting, billing/invoicing, and leave management in one product rather than requiring separate tools.
Offers both a cloud-hosted (SaaS) version and a self-hosted/on-premise deployment, giving teams control over where their data lives.
Per-user pricing scales down at higher headcounts, and a limited free tier plus free trial lower the barrier to try it.
Provides an API and a Chrome browser extension alongside QuickBooks and Zapier integrations for connecting to existing workflows.
Cons
Native integration list is comparatively small compared to modern time-tracking competitors; broader connectivity leans on Zapier rather than direct integrations.
Self-hosted deployment adds IT setup and maintenance overhead that a pure cloud SaaS competitor wouldn't require.
Public marketing materials disclose limited hard pricing detail up front, requiring visitors to dig for exact plan costs.
Kimai
Pros
Free, self-hostable open-source core with no user limits
Low per-seat pricing on Kimai Cloud compared to many SaaS competitors
Extensive JSON API and plugin ecosystem for customization
GDPR-compliant hosting option in Germany
Active development with a long project history since 2006
Cons
Self-hosting requires server setup and maintenance effort
Advanced features like approvals and expense tracking require the Professional plan or plugins
Smaller company behind the product compared to large SaaS time-tracking vendors
Interface may feel less polished than premium commercial competitors