Compare OpenTimeClock and actitime on pricing, features, platforms, and ratings — both Time Tracking tools, Freemium pricing to decide which fits your team.
At a Glance
OpenTimeClock
actitime
Primary category
Time Tracking
Time Tracking
Rating
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing model
Freemium
Freemium
Starting price
Free (unlimited users); Paid plan from $39/month
Not documented
Free plan
Yes
Yes
Free trial
Not documented
Yes
Platforms
Web, iOS, Android, Mac, Windows
Not documented
Team collaboration
Not documented
Yes
AI features
Not documented
Not documented
Public API
Not documented
Not documented
Pricing Compared
Starting price reflects the lowest paid tier, not the full cost for every team size or usage level.
OpenTimeClock
Free Plan — Free N/A
Paid Plan (Monthly) — $39/month Monthly
Paid Plan (Yearly) — $399/year (~$33.25/month) Annual
Sponsor Link — Free (in exchange for a homepage link) N/A
actitime
No individual plan breakdown documented yet.
Pros & Cons
OpenTimeClock
Pros
Free plan supports unlimited employees, which is rare among time-tracking competitors that charge per seat.
Paid plan is inexpensive relative to per-user competitors, especially for larger teams.
Supports multiple clock-in methods, including GPS, facial recognition, and offline mode.
Includes job costing and PTO accrual tracking typically reserved for pricier platforms.
Nonprofit-friendly pricing and a free 'Sponsor Link' option for cost-conscious organizations.
Cons
Free plan loses PDF/Excel report export after the initial 30-day trial period.
Company does not publicly disclose a physical headquarters or leadership team, which may concern due-diligence-conscious buyers.
Interface and design feel dated compared to newer, VC-backed time-tracking competitors.
Smaller integration ecosystem with payroll and HR platforms than larger competitors like TSheets/QuickBooks Time or Deputy.
Customer support is phone/email based with limited hours rather than 24/7 live chat.
actitime
Pros
Combines time tracking with project budgeting, billing/invoicing, and leave management in one product rather than requiring separate tools.
Offers both a cloud-hosted (SaaS) version and a self-hosted/on-premise deployment, giving teams control over where their data lives.
Per-user pricing scales down at higher headcounts, and a limited free tier plus free trial lower the barrier to try it.
Provides an API and a Chrome browser extension alongside QuickBooks and Zapier integrations for connecting to existing workflows.
Cons
Native integration list is comparatively small compared to modern time-tracking competitors; broader connectivity leans on Zapier rather than direct integrations.
Self-hosted deployment adds IT setup and maintenance overhead that a pure cloud SaaS competitor wouldn't require.
Public marketing materials disclose limited hard pricing detail up front, requiring visitors to dig for exact plan costs.
Use Cases
OpenTimeClock
Small business payroll-ready time tracking — Small businesses use the free or paid plan to track hourly employee attendance and export data for payroll processing.
Multi-site and field-service workforce tracking — Companies with mobile or multi-location employees use GPS geofencing and offline clock-in to verify attendance away from a central office.
Nonprofit and school attendance tracking — Nonprofits and schools with large or fluctuating headcounts use the unlimited-user free tier to track staff or volunteer hours without per-seat costs.